Jewish pluralism ~ progressive Judaism ~ Outreach and a welcoming Judaism ~ Inter-faith relationships ~ Jewish Patrilineal (Equilineal) Descent ~ Religion and State in Israel

ZaraMart

Wednesday, August 13, 2008

Women’s voices in the corridors of power

British Prime Minister Gordon Brown Visits Israel

(This piece began as a response to the issue of female MKs being excluded from the Knesset choir which sang the national anthem during the British PM’s visit to Israel. It has mutated into a more general rant against the black tide that continues to sweep through the Jewish world (particularly Israel) today. So be it.)

Elsewhere in the world, Jews gravitate towards societies that protect freedom; economic, social and religious.

Elsewhere in the world, Jews are in the forefront of the ongoing struggle to ensure the separation of church (religion) and state.

Elsewhere in the world, Jews recognize, condemn and distance themselves in all ways from religious fundamentalism, whether Christian, Islamic or Jewish.

Elsewhere in the world, Jews are the first to rush to defend the rights of minorities and disadvantaged or marginalized groups, from the largest “minority” (women) to the smallest.

This is as it should be. In Israel, however, the opposite appears to be happening.

Here, the advocates of Grim Judaism are managing to turn back the clock in another arena of public life, and that arena the Knesset, the very body that should be a powerful bulwark against the tyranny of those claiming to speak in the name of tradition.

Middle Israel, the mainstream, the secular and traditional majority that makes up the very essence of Israel appears not to recognize the danger, or perhaps to have become reconciled to it or exhausted by it.

The public figures (including notably and disgracefully the Speaker of the Knesset, Dalia Itzik) who should be fighting these battles appear to have sold out their constituencies once again. Once again the public and the ideals they should be serving have been betrayed, and they have handed over to the Dark Side what does not belong to them; what belongs to all of us.

And so the country that proudly (justifiably) holds itself to be the only outpost of democracy in this benighted region betrays fully half its population in one fell swoop. How? By allowing that a woman’s voice should not be heard singing in the very place that should fight to the death to protect that right.

And to whom do they make this concession?

To the opponents of Zionism, to those whose every action and deed undermines it.

To those who played little part in the making of an independent Israel, and who to this day play only the feeblest role in furthering it.

To those who isolate themselves from the rest of Israeli society, who fail (nay, refuse) to send their sons (and daughters) to defend it, who send their women out to be both breadwinners and caregivers.

To those who contribute little but grasp all they can from the public purse, with their ceaseless demands and their ceaseless procreation.

There are so many threats to the present and future of Israel, this precious and irreplaceable gift from just a few generations that immediately preceded ours, and including the one still with us, our own Greatest Generation.

The most insidious threat, however, is this one. This black tide has the potential to transform Israel from a strong, vibrant democracy where any and every Jew can find a place, into a dismal Kehilla, a bloated Ghetto that will exclude and include, allow and forbid, until Middle Israel gives up and leaves, and those who remain fall to the sword-stroke of a waiting Islam.

Am I being overly dramatic? Perhaps. But this would not be the first society to be destroyed because it failed to confront its enemies, domestic and foreign.

Right now the real Israel has the ability and the mandate to end these attacks on its core values.

Just weeks ago, it could have ended this crisis by inviting – politely but firmly - those who find the sound of women’s voices in song offensive (or who can’t concentrate because lust overwhelms them) to simply absent themselves from the event.

Will it still be able to do this in a year from now? In five or ten? I fear the worst.

I’m glad to see that at least some recognize the significance of this seemingly insignificant event. I hope that those who have defended the rights of women in Jewish society elsewhere in the world and on other issues will take up this particular struggle as well.

Time is running out. How much more of this erosion can Israel’s institutions endure?

Monday, August 11, 2008

Why I’m not on JBlogSphere [.] com: Does this explain it?

In a post late last year, I speculated as to the reason why I couldn’t get my Israel advocacy blog Altneuland onto the JBlogSphere [.] com Jewish blog aggregator. At the time, I assumed it was either a technical issue, or that the site was no longer being maintained.

It appears there may be a simpler explanation. I accidentally clicked through to the site the other day, and I see that the following banner is now displayed on the home page:

Welcome to JBlogSphere [.] com - aggregating Frum Jewish Blogs online.

The site description now reads as follows:

JBlogSphere [.] com - Jewish, frum and religious blogs in the jblogosphere

So, I guess that explains it. Altneuland was not considered “frum” enough. Cafe Birkenreis would presumably be considered even less so!

I guess I must be doing something right.

At the time, I had this apparently naïve belief that in order to be added to these J-Blogosphere aggregators and directories, I simply needed to ask. As with so many other things in the Jewish world these days, however, it seems that your “yichus” must first be vetted. I guess I must have been really desperate for inbound links…

Related posts:

Cafe Birkenreis: Pimp my Blog: J-Blogosphere: JBlogSphere [.] com

Thursday, August 7, 2008

Limmud SA and the Orthodox rabbinate: What are they afraid of?

kippah and tallit with siddur

A reminder to my readers in SA that Limmud South Africa takes place in Cape Town, Durban and Johannesburg over the period 29 August to 3 September 2008. Check the Limmud SA website for exact details for your city. If you’re planning to boycott Limmud in line with the call from the Orthodox chief rabbi and rabbinate (SARA), boy, are you ever on the wrong blog!

From the little that I’ve been able to find on the web regarding the boycott, this appears to be the best explanation (from It's Almost Supernatural):

The rumours I have heard seem to indicate that SARA is uncomfortable with the fact that Reform Rabbis and secular scholars will be giving talks on the Jewish religion. The logic as I was explained it, is that the Orthodox Rabbinate sees itself as the only legitimate vehicle for Jewish religious instruction in South Africa. Limmud with a mix of talks by representatives of all Jewish streams clearly presents a threat to this monopoly. Moreover they can not accept the premises of Limmud that all subjects of Jewish interest (from Torah to food) should be given equal space.

Fortunately the Orthodox rabbinate no longer has the coercive power of the Kehilla, so the boycott is limited to the rabbinate itself and to anyone over whom they have some form of influence (not to be underestimated). Limmud will miss out on the participation of those who heed the boycott, but at the same time those who heed it are unlikely to have benefited from Limmud anyway. Limmud, I guess, will benefit from all the free publicity surrounding the boycott. Win some, lose some.

To me it almost appears as if Orthodoxy in SA is still fighting the war against Emancipation and the Enlightenment. I see this as the tragedy of Judaism in the centuries since then; that “mainstream” Judaism (what has now come to be identified with Orthodoxy) failed to meet the challenge of these critical events and ideologies, and instead chose to turn inward.

In my understanding, this was the first time ever that Judaism had withdrawn from competing in the marketplace of ideas, and the repercussions can be felt to this day.

While various movements within Judaism (Reform, Conservative, even Zionism) went on to try and meet the challenges of the secular age, the blessing of Rabbinic Judaism was withheld from these attempts. The flight from Judaism into assimilation, the delegitimisation of the ABO (Anything But Orthodox) streams of Judaism, the Haredisation and contraction of Orthodoxy can all be traced back to this turning point.

Emancipation and Enlightenment did not represent a greater challenge than previous ones (consider Paganism, Hellenism, Christianity, Islam, etc.), but because the challenge was not met head on, it proved to be the crucial one. The failure to respond cohesively left much of the Jewish world asking fundamental questions about Judaism and being Jewish; questions that remain without a consensus answer to this day.

End of amateur sociological lecture.

Head on over to the Limmud SA website and book (please). Booking in advance will assist the organizers (all volunteers) in their planning. In addition, if you book before 10 August (Johannesburg only), conference fees are discounted. Fees vary from venue to venue and are discounted for children, students and pensioners.

Monday, July 28, 2008

Don’t donate to Chabad!

spr08cover

Below is the text of a letter I’ve just submitted to the Reform Judaism Magazine. I’m a bit dubious as to whether it will ever make it into print or not; Reform Judaism is published only quarterly, with just a small selection of letters being included. So, in case it never makes it between the covers of RJ, here it is:

I was shocked to read (Letter from Rabbi Michael M Remson in the Spring 2008 edition of Reform Judaism) that “many Reform Jews donate to Chabad”. In the US they may be more circumspect, but in South Africa and elsewhere, Chabad makes no secret of the fact that it considers Reform Judaism to be Reform, not Judaism. Our rabbis are little more than reform clerics and our converts are quite simply “not Jews”.

The letter also mentioned that “Chabad unabashedly claims to be doing God’s work”, but that’s a claim any TV evangelist can make.

Yes, we should be motivated by the work and the attitude of their Shlichim (emissaries), but we should be motivated to imitate their example, not support it. To my mind, there is no discussion: Chabad is no friend of Reform Judaism, and should not enjoy the support of the Reform community or individuals.

Those within Reform who wish to give to initiatives that reach out to the marginalized or unaffiliated should rather consider supporting the activities of The World Union for Progressive Judaism (WUPJ), the global umbrella body for progressive Judaism in all its diversity. Pioneering congregations throughout the European Union, the former Soviet Union, Israel and elsewhere need our support; financial, organizational and moral.

Have a look at the newsletters on the WUPJ website and, the next time you reach for your checkbook to support outreach to the unaffiliated, ignore pseudo-outreach organizations such as Chabad. Rather make your check out to the WUPJ and stipulate that you’d like to support the activities of Rabbi Joel Oseran, their vice president for international development. I’m sure the URJ has or supports similar initiatives within the US itself.

Imitation is indeed the sincerest form of flattery, and I believe we should be imitating (NOT supporting) Chabad’s example when it comes to global outreach. I’m not sure yet how we could achieve this without the cultist mindset of the Chabad Shlichim, but one of the most apparent needs amongst fledgling progressive communities is for trained (and preferably full-time) spiritual leadership, i.e. a rabbi. So, how about setting up a fund for “Rabbis in Remote Places”, to cover the cost of training and subsidizing the remuneration of spiritual leaders for these start-up communities?

Let’s hear from you out there!

Links/Reading/Resources:

Reform Judaism Magazine - Home

Reform Judaism Magazine - Spring 2008

The World Union for Progressive Judaism | WUPJnews

The World Union for Progressive Judaism | Our Newsletter

Related:

Cafe Birkenreis: A Jew is a Jew is a Jew...: You contradict yourself

Monday, July 21, 2008

The conversion crisis: End the religious-bureaucratic complex

I was pleased to see from this JTA article that Diaspora Jewish leaders are finally beginning to respond to the crisis in Israel regarding conversions to Judaism. Jewish leaders outside of Israel are understandably reluctant to intervene in something that may be considered an internal Israeli matter, but this is something that affects Jews (and in particular Jews by Choice and their descendants) everywhere.

According to the article:

Leaders of the United Jewish Communities federation umbrella organization sent a sharply worded letter to Olmert on July 9 urging him to assign his Cabinet secretary "to oversee conversion."

In order to keep up the momentum generated by this initiative, I would like to see the leadership of all the major non-Orthodox streams of Judaism – both in the US and globally – direct similar letters to all leadership figures in Israel.

The leaders of the Conservative, Reconstructionist and Liberal/Progressive/Reform streams of Judaism worldwide should call on all the main Israeli leadership figures and offices to do their utmost to ensure that conversions performed by these streams of Judaism – both within and outside Israel – are unequivocally recognised by the Israeli authorities.

Petitions should be addressed to the President, Prime Minister, Speaker of the Knesset, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court and the heads of all the major non-Haredi political parties.

The leadership of the non-Orthodox streams of Judaism should actually go further than the UJC and call for all matters regarding conversion to be taken out of the dead hands of the Haredi-dominated rabbinate. There should be a complete separation between those responsible for bringing converts into Judaism – the rabbis and courts of all the major streams of Judaism, duly authorised by their own movements – and those responsible for recording such conversions for Israeli identity purposes (the Interior Ministry). The ministry should not be permitted to question the validity of such conversions on religious grounds.

A complete separation between secular and religious functions – an end to the religious-bureaucratic complex - in Israel is long overdue. All members of the non-Orthodox movements should call on their leadership to put pressure on Israel to end this anachronism, and with it the harm that it inflicts on Judaism and the Jewish people daily.

UJC, JAFI press Olmert on conversion - JTA, Jewish & Israel News

Wednesday, July 16, 2008

Road under construction

I am in the process of implementing new Blogger/Blogspot XML templates across all my blogs.

Please bear with me, as there may be some disruption, broken links and widgets, etc., during the transition.

I will be utilizing various 3-column layouts from the eBlog Templates website. (See the link below.)

Free Blogger Templates and How-To Blogger Articles | eBlog Templates

Tuesday, July 8, 2008

How to change the world: a guide for inter faith families

I regularly correspond with someone intensely involved in trying to have the status of Patrilineal Jews formally and unequivocally recognized within progressive Judaism and the State of Israel. At the end of the last round of e-mails, the questions weighed heavily on my mind: how DO we go about making the Jewish world (or rather, the progressive part of it) more friendly and accommodating towards those in inter faith relationships (IFRs) and sociological Jews (the “hyphenated Jews”, variously referred to as Patrilineal Jews, half-Jews, non-Halachic Jews or even non-Jews; anyone who happens to have been born with the "wrong" Jewish parent)?

These notes are an attempt to answer that question. This is still very much a draft, so comments and feedback would be welcomed and appreciated.

  • Stay informed regarding efforts to reach out to those on the fringes of the Jewish world (Jewish Outreach Institute), those in IFRs (InterfaithFamily.com) and Patrilineal Jews (Jewish Justice).
  • When issues relating to outreach, etc., are aired, make your views known by means of letters to Jewish and general publications.
  • Put your views across by means of timely and relevant comments on Jewish and other websites when outreach issues are raised.
  • Where appropriate, consider creating or supporting online petitions to help change the status of sociological Jews, those in IFRs, etc. (I’m not aware of any currently in operation.)
  • Support those organizations attempting (in various ways) to build a welcoming Judaism. Big Tent Judaism (a JOI initiative), InterfaithFamily.com and the Jewish Outreach Institute are the ones I’m aware of. I’m sure there are a number of others that haven’t appeared on my radar.
  • Link up with other individuals or families in the same situation. The sites referred to can help point you in the right direction. Facebook and other social media sites may well be the way to achieve the initial networking.
  • Look out for and share resources such as organizations, books and other publications and websites or blogs. The few I’ve mentioned are, I’m sure, just the tip of the iceberg.
  • When considering membership in a congregation or minyan, make it clear that your decision to join or not join will be heavily influenced by the attitude towards IFFs and sociological Jews.
  • If you’re unable to find a suitably welcoming spiritual home for you and your family, consider starting your own minyan or congregation. In the same way that LGBT congregations are now becoming mainstream, such “Outreach” congregations could help to change attitudes while providing comfort zone for those on the margins.
  • When considering a Jewish day school for your children, be upfront about concerns regarding outreach. (Your options are, however, likely to be somewhat limited here. Perhaps we’ll see an improvement once Hebrew charter schools start to gain traction.)
  • Likewise, when considering joining or supporting any other Jewish organization, make your views known, and let it be understood that your decision will be influenced by its stance regarding outreach.
  • When casting your vote for office bearers in any Jewish organization to which you already belong, make it clear that the candidates' stance on outreach and acceptance is key.
  • Similarly when donating to a particular Jewish cause. Here’s where you REALLY have the upper hand. Make your donation count, by aligning your giving with strongly held beliefs. There are plenty of worthy Jewish causes out there; avoid supporting those that discriminate against IFFs (inter faith families).
  • On occasion, your purchasing decisions can also be made to count. I’m not a great believer in the efficacy of boycotts, but take a consumer activist approach and try to ensure that your purchasing power is aligned with your beliefs and ideology.
  • Understand the case for the recognition of Patrilineal (or equilineal) descent in Judaism. The Jewish Justice website is the best resource in this regard.
  • Make use of the form letters on the Jewish Justice website to bring the plight of Patrilineal Jews to the attention of those who currently have the whip hand.
  • Within progressive Judaism, call for a uniform approach and attitude towards IFRs and their offspring across the entire WUPJ. One’s Jewish status should not change when moving to another congregation or country.
  • If you’re a sociological Jew, you should probably stick with Reconstructionist and Reform Judaism, unless you’re prepared to undergo (another?) conversion, that is. In which case this is probably not your fight anyway…
  • Prepare your kids, particularly those being raised by a non-Jewish mother. Just because they’re accepted by their own community does not mean they will never encounter the “you’re not really Jewish” canard from some smug, self-satisfied “Real Jew”. Make them aware that they may encounter such attitudes and how to deal with them.
  • Steer clear of pseudo-outreach organizations such as Chabad. Rather channel your hopes, efforts, energy and dollars to those organizations genuinely concerned with all of those on the fringes of the Jewish world, not just so-called Halachic Jews.
  • There is probably much that can be learned from the struggle of LGBT Jews for acceptance by the Jewish community. This is a process of changing attitudes that may take decades, but based on the LGBT experience, there is no reason why it can’t succeed. The issue of outreach to IFFs is one that that probably impacts a much greater part of the Jewish community than does the LGBT issue.
  • Realize that this is probably THE central issue confronting the Jewish world today, and that you’re on the just side of the debate. Expect the mainstream to eventually catch up and invest far more effort and funds into outreach.

I’m positive that if we all take as many of these actions as possible, we will succeed in making the Jewish world a friendlier place for those on the fringes, who still see themselves as part of the Jewish assembly.

Big Tent Judaism

InterfaithFamily.com

jewish matrilineal patrilineal descent

Jewish Mosaic: The National Center for Sexual and Gender Diversity

The Jewish Outreach Institute

JewsByChoice.Org: Your people will be my people and your G-d will be my G-d - Ruth 1:16

As Acceptance Grows, Gay Synagogues Torn Between the Straight and Narrow

Tuesday, June 24, 2008

A Jew is a Jew is a Jew...: You contradict yourself

The SA Jewish Report for 9 May 2008 (.PDF) carried a piece by (Lubavitch) Rabbi Yossy Goldman entitled “A Jew is a Jew is a Jew...” The piece dealt with the growing trend within SA Judaism’s religious right to delegitimize and denigrate Jews who don’t meet the required standard of Orthodoxy, observance, frumkeit, or whatever the measure is. Anyone not meeting the required standard is simply dismissed as “not a real Jew” or not a Jew at all.

Despite what Rabbi Goldman says, this attitude is far, far more widespread than he acknowledges, not just in SA. It has now also become common currency with Israel’s political right, even where it does not overlap with the religious right. Anyone who breaks ranks with entrenched positions runs the risk of having his or her Jewish bona-fides called into question.

Leaving aside Rabbi Goldman’s spirited defense of “the spiritual nature of every Jewish soul”, I found one the Rabbi’s concluding paragraphs to be quite enlightening. He says:

On the other hand, we mustn't confuse issues. While a Reform Jew is fully Jewish, no Orthodox rabbi will agree that a Reform convert is authentically Jewish. It's not only Chief Rabbi (Warren) Goldstein or the Beth Din but Chief Rabbi Jonathan Sacks (of Great Britain) as well.

So, while a Reform Jew is fully Jewish (gee, thanks Yossy, that makes me feel so much better), Reform Judaism is presumably not even close to being “fully Jewish”. Rabbi Goldman scrupulously avoids using “Reform Judaism”, preferring the term “Reform”. (As a member of Chabad, perhaps Rabbi Goldman should recall the history of his movement and how early Hasidism were persecuted by the Mitnagdim for many of the same reasons as he now uses to deny Reform its authenticity. They only managed to achieve eventual acceptance by becoming “more Catholic than the Pope” in terms of observance. The erstwhile revolutionaries are now the establishment.)

So, if Reform is not Kosher, and Reform converts are not authentically Jewish, I guess a less than welcoming attitude towards Reform Jews in general is understandable. Who knows, the Reform Jew standing in front of you may well be a Reform convert, or the offspring of a Reform convert.

Your age-old definition of a Jew is “one born of a Jewish mother”. In an era where we are all “Jews by Choice” it will no longer suffice. My definition of a Jew is one with a longer and even more distinguished pedigree, “all those who would cast their lot with the Jewish people”.

As the old saying goes, “With friends like that, who needs enemies?”

Perhaps the Reform and unaffiliated Jews (particularly in the US) who contribute to the outreach efforts of Chabad need to be made aware of attitudes like this before reaching for their wallets.

Monday, June 9, 2008

Joel Oseran at SAUPJ Indaba

In a previous post on the blog Altneuland, I mentioned the address given by Rabbi Joel Oseran at the European Region Conference of The World Union for Progressive Judaism (WUPJ) in Vienna (March 13 through 16, 2008). I suggested that “it [the address] needs to become something akin to a manifesto for Liberal, Progressive and Reform Jewish communities worldwide.”

According to an article on the SAUPJ (The SA Union for Progressive Judaism) website, it appears that Rabbi Oseran will be a keynote speaker at the SAUPJ Indaba, its biennial conference, to be held in Cape Town from Friday 13 to Sunday 15 June.

The other guest speaker will be Dalya Levy, executive director of Arzenu, the Zionist movement of Progressive Judaism based in Israel.

Presumably only those on the committees of the various Reform congregations countrywide and various invited guests will be attending. Perhaps one day when I’m big, I’ll also get invited to events such as this (no irony intended)!